Mon 15 Sep, 2008
Yesterday was Sunday. On Sunday’s I do my best to not leave my house, unless I go for a swim. I believe in having 1 day a week to really relax and rest. Yesterday, while watching some afternoon TV I saw this commercial on High Fructose Corn Syrup.
It went a lot like this:
Two moms are pouring juice into cups while at a pool party full of kids. 1 of the moms says “Whoa, that stuff isn’t good for our kids it has high fructose corn syrup in it.” The other mom says, “Oh really, well whats so bad about it?” The first mom doesn’t know what to say, and so the second mom says its sugar and just like sugar or honey is ok for our kids.”
I flew up off of my couch disbelieving what I just saw and went to their website www.sweetsurprise.com. You have to see it to believe it. A whole website, of course sponsored by the Corn syrup association, trying to convince you that nothing is wrong with their product.
Let me take a minute and share what is wrong with High Fructose Corn Syrup.
Until the 1970s most of the sugar we ate came from sucrose derived from sugar beets or sugar cane. Then sugar from corn–corn syrup, fructose, dextrose, dextrine and especially high fructose corn syrup (HFCS)–began to gain popularity as a sweetener because it was much less expensive to produce. High fructose corn syrup can be manipulated to contain equal amounts of fructose and glucose, or up to 80 percent fructose and 20 percent glucose. Thus, with almost twice the fructose, HFCS delivers a double danger compared to sugar.
(With regards to fruit, the ratio is usually 50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose, but most commercial fruit juices have HFCS added. Fruit contains fiber which slows down the metabolism of fructose and other sugars, but the fructose in HFCS is absorbed very quickly.)
In 1980 the average person ate 39 pounds of fructose and 84 pounds of sucrose. In 1994 the average person ate 66 pounds of sucrose and 83 pounds of fructose, providing 19 percent of total caloric energy. Today approximately 25 percent of our average caloric intake comes from sugars, with the larger fraction as fructose.
The process of pulling sugar from cornstarch wasn’t perfected until the early 1970s, when Japanese researchers developed a reliable way to turn cornstarch into syrup sweet enough to compete with liquid sugar. After some tinkering, they landed on a formula that was 55 percent fructose and 45 percent glucose — sweet enough and cheap enough to make most soda companies jump from liquid sugar to high fructose corn syrup by the 1980s.
Because high fructose corn syrup mixes easily, extends shelf-life and is as much as 20 percent cheaper than other sources of sugar, large-scale food manufacturers love it. It can help prevent freezer burn, so you’ll find it on the labels of many frozen foods. It helps breads brown and keeps them soft, which is why hot dog buns and even English muffins seem to last for weeks on your counter without getting moldy or hard.
The question remains just how much more dangerous high fructose corn syrup is than other sugars.
Fructose or Glucose -
In the past, fructose was considered beneficial to diabetics because it is absorbed only 40 percent as quickly as glucose and causes only a modest rise in blood sugar. However, research on other hormonal factors suggests that fructose actually promotes disease more readily than glucose. Glucose is metabolized in every cell in the body but all fructose must be metabolized in the liver. The livers of test animals fed large amounts of fructose develop fatty deposits and cirrhosis, similar to problems that develop in the livers of alcoholics.
Pure fructose contains no enzymes, vitamins or minerals and robs the body of its micro-nutrient treasures in order to assimilate itself for physiological use. While naturally occurring sugars, as well as sucrose, contain fructose bound to other sugars, high fructose corn syrup contains a good deal of “free” or unbound fructose. Research indicates that this free fructose interferes with the heart’s use of key minerals like magnesium, copper and chromium, all of which are essential is supporting healthy bones, and connective tissue. Among other consequences, HFCS has been implicated in elevated blood cholesterol levels, the creation of blood clots, osteoporosis and osteopenia, obesity, and attention deficit disorders in both adults and children. It has been found to inhibit the action of white blood cells so that they are unable to defend the body against harmful foreign invaders.
Journalist Greg Critser lays out a compelling case against high fructose corn syrup in his 2003 book, “Fat Land: How Americans Became the Fattest People in the World.” He argues that federal policies that aimed to stabilize food prices and support corn production in the 1970s led to a glut of corn and then to high fructose corn syrup. With a cheaper way to sweeten food, producers pumped up the size and amount of sweet snacks and drinks on the market and increased profits.
The FDA is even public with its opinion on HFCS:
“The use of synthetic fixing agents in the enzyme preparation, which is then used to produce HFCS, would not be consistent with our (…) policy regarding the use of the term ‘natural’,” said Geraldine June.
Critser writes that despite the food industry’s arguments that sugar is sugar, whether fructose or sucrose, no group “has yet refuted the growing scientific concern that, when all is said and done, fructose … is about the furthest thing from natural that one can imagine, let alone eat.”
Although some researchers have long been suspicious that too much fructose can cause problems, the latest case against high fructose corn syrup began in earnest a few years ago. Dr. George Bray, principal investigator of the Diabetes Prevention Program at Louisiana State University Medical Center told the International Congress on Obesity that in 1980, just after high fructose corn syrup was introduced in mass quantities, relatively stable obesity rates began to climb. By 2000, they had doubled.
Further, the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2002 published research that showed that teenagers’ milk consumption between 1965 and 1996 decreased by 36 percent, while soda consumption increased by more than 200 percent. Bray argues that without calcium, which nutritionists agree can help the body regulate weight, kids got fatter. He says that he could find no other single combination of environmental or food changes that were as significant to the rise in obesity.
The important thing to note here is that not only are people getting fatter, their bodies are weaker as a result. Their weight will be related to hormonal issues, metabolic issues, and congnitive and emotional deficiencies as well.
So there is my rant on this monday morning. My conclusion stay away from HFCS like the plague, and if your at a party or on some picnic with your friends and one of them tries to tell you HFCS is fine and even good for you - slap them and tell them to wake up.
Have a good week
Some information gathered from westonaprice.org, and the San Fransisco Chronicle as well as other medical reference journals and research regarding HFCS.

